Umweltbundesamt

Home > Klimalotse - Supporting management of climate change risks and chances (decision support system)

Klimalotse - Supporting management of climate change risks and chances (decision support system)

23.02.2015

Hintergrund und Ziele

Objective: Creation of an information and decision support system for management of climate effects, particularly for communities and businesses in Germany.

The background to the project is the increasing urgency of the issues of climate change, climate effects and adaptation. The project addresses the increasing need for advice from various adaptation players and the growing interest in tools and methods for appropriate climate effect management.

The project will focus on development the Climate Pilot, an information and decision support system that will be generally accessible as online guidelines through the ⁠KomPass⁠ website from the summer of 2010. Using structured questions in five modules, users will be made aware of the issue of adaptation and introduced to systematic analysis of the risks and opportunities of climate change for the relevant organisation.

The methods proposed by the Climate Pilot, e.g. risk and multi-criteria analysis, along with a range of example adaptation measures and supplementary materials support users in identifying their own adaptation measures and in implementing and monitoring them. To provide adequate coverage of users' varying information needs, the tool will offer a fast-track option and a more intensive process. Special areas of content are planned for decision makers in communities and in KMUs.

Laufzeit

Oktober 2008 bis Juli 2010

Untersuchungsregion/-raum

Land
  • Deutschland
Bundesland
  • Baden-Württemberg
  • Bayern
  • Berlin
  • Brandenburg
  • Bremen
  • Hamburg
  • Hessen
  • Mecklenburg-Vorpommern
  • Niedersachsen
  • Nordrhein-Westfalen
  • Rheinland-Pfalz
  • Saarland
  • Sachsen
  • Sachsen-Anhalt
  • Schleswig-Holstein
  • Thüringen
Naturräumliche Zuordnung
  • Alb und nordbayerisches Hügelland
  • Alpen
  • Erzgebirge, Thüringer und Bayrischer Wald
  • Links- und rechtsrheinische Mittelgebirge
  • Nordostdeutsches Tiefland
  • Nordwestdeutsches Tiefland
  • Südostdeutsche Becken und Hügel
  • Westdeutsche Tieflandsbucht
  • Zentrale Mittelgebirge und Harz
Räumliche Auflösung / Zusatzinformationen 

Küste

Schritte im Prozess zur Anpassung an den Klimawandel

Schritt 1: Klimawandel verstehen und beschreiben

Ansatz und Ergebnisse 

Information from global and various regional climate models will be used.

Parameter (Klimasignale)
  • Hitzewellen
  • Veränderte Niederschlagsmuster
  • Höhere mittlere Temperaturen
  • Starkniederschlag (inkl. Hagel, Schnee)
  • Sturm
Weitere Parameter 

Warmer and wetter winters, hotter and dryer summers, increasing probability and intensity of extreme weather events, such as heat waves in summer and severe precipitation, particularly in winter and spring, and an increase in storm events

Weitere Zeitangaben 

Up to 2100.

Schritt 2a: Risiken erkennen und bewerten (Klimafolgen/-wirkungen)

Analyseansatz 

All direct (physical) and indirect effects of climate change, e.g. increase reputation risk for companies in high-emission sectors.

Describe here, which approach for the vulnerability analysis, risks and/or chances is/was used within your project and which results emerged from it or are expected

Ansatz und Risiken / Chancen 

Example list of vulnerable areas like industrial and commercial companies that use cooling water from watercourses. Climate change means that the cooling water has higher temperatures in summer. This can reduce the efficiency of cooling processes, and also places an additional burden on the watercourses.

Dringlichkeit und Priorisierung von Anpassungsbedarf 

Depending on the relevant company

Schritt 3: Maßnahmen entwickeln und vergleichen

Maßnahmen und/oder Strategien 

Example list of adaptation measures: Change in cooling processes in production methods from water and air cooling.

Zeithorizont
  • 2071–2100 (ferne Zukunft)

Schritt 4: Maßnahmen planen und umsetzen

Kosten 

Depending on company size and selected technology.

In making decisions on larger scale projects with long implementation periods, a quantitative assessment of alternative courses of action is necessary in addition to the qualitative analysis. A quantitative analysis allows for a more accurate evaluation and includes a provision for direct and indirect costs, as well as direct and indirect benefits of adaptation measures (e.g. on the basis of cost-benefit analyses).

Wer war oder ist beteiligt?

Förderung / Finanzierung 

German Environment Agency

Projektleitung 

UBA: KomPass

Beteiligte/Partner 

Adelphi Research gGmbH, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research

Ansprechpartner

adelphi
Caspar-Theyss-Strasse 14a
D-14193 Berlin

Herr Hasse
Wörlitzer Platz 1
D-06844 Dessau-Roßlau
clemens.hasse @ uba.de

Links

  • Klimalotse
Artikel:

Handlungsfelder:
 agriculture  biological diversity  buildings  energy infrastructure  financial services industry  human health and care  industry and commerce  spatial planning, urban and settlement development  tourism industry  transport and transport infrastructure  water regime and water management  woodland and forestry Top

„Für Mensch und Umwelt“ ist der Leitspruch des ⁠UBA⁠ und bringt auf den Punkt, wofür wir da sind. In diesem Video geben wir Einblick in unsere Arbeit. 

Umweltbundesamt

Kontakt

Wörlitzer Platz 1
06844 Dessau-Roßlau
Bitte richten Sie Ihre Anfragen ausschließlich über das Kontaktformular "UBA fragen" an uns.
Infolge der großen Anzahl von Anfragen kann es bei der Beantwortung zu Verzögerungen kommen. Wir bitten um Verständnis.

Quelladresse (zuletzt bearbeitet am 25.05.2018):https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/node/16326